Few manufacturers venture into this area as users generally want a smartphone that is a minimum of 5. Luckily, Samsung and Sony are an exception to this rule.

Here we have two different styles. Both devices have fingerprint readers. On the Samsung device it’s located, as usual, on the Home button at the bottom of the screen, between the two smart keys.

On the Sony device, it is located on the side, on the power button.

More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. Sony xperia x compact vs samsung a3 2017 Date approved – Shows the date when the particular phone is approved by the Federal Communications Commission.

Another similarity: both phones allow you to use a microSD card with a maximum capacity of GB. On the Sony device, the card slot is found on the side while Samsung have placed it on the right-hand side for the first time.

With its x 65 x 9. Both devices are exactly the same weight: grams.

While appearance is a matter of taste, I would have a preference for Samsung due to its waterproofing. The X Compact is slightly smaller and this is reflected in the screen size.

It measures 4. This could be a deciding factor for some, but another element forces the issue: the Sony smartphone occupies more space with Both devices have the same definition, x 1, HD definition.

Both phones run with Android 6.

With that said, the Nougat update is available for the Xperia X Compact while the A3 is still limited to Marshmallow for the moment.

Xperia UI is slightly closer to Stock which will thrill the purists, but TouchWiz has become rather elegant, especially if you compare it to the appearance that it made on previous models.

That said, both devices have the same default feature: preinstalled applications.

This is really a question of preference and habit. In normal, daily usage, both devices are fast, neither suffer from bugs or delays, and they can handle more or less any game without issue and without the phone overheating.

The Sony device offers a better internal memory. Samsung offers 0.

Sony has an advantage: it built its own lenses and mastered the subject. On the whole, images taken with the Galaxy A3 seem to be more successful but both devices struggle with poor lighting.

Sony xperia x compact vs samsung a3 2017 paly

In practice, both devices take good selfies but the Galaxy A3 is slightly better despite the small problem with lighting. Despite its poor battery capacity, the Samsung device has a good battery life.

In both devices, you can get a day and a half of usage, perhaps even more with moderate usage. Although the Xperia X Compact offers several interesting features, to me, it seems better to opt for a Samsung if I had to choose between the two.

It offers more functions, especially the waterproof feature, and it costs less than the Xperia X Compact which has been on the market for more than 3 months.

It’s a hard choice, but which one would you choose?

Sony Xperia X Compact vs Samsung Galaxy A3 () – Phone Comparison

Let us know in the comments below. Dont compare crap vs gold. X compact could be compared with s7 and people who like reliable phone, all round performance and cheaper gear will still think x compact is better.

I have bought x compact but after one week returned it back too hot surface of the telephone during charge.

I created an account just so I could leave this comment. This article is terrible.

25.02.2020 – Samsung Exynos Number of cores: 6 8 Max. Offline voice recognition enables you to perform voice actions, like dictating texts or using various voice commands, without an internet connection. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. Palm Phone

You mention Sony having the advantage at every turn, but in the end, you recommend the Samsung? Your reasons are not even good. TouchWiz alone makes this an easy win for the Xperia Compact X, but you mention several factors that give Sony the edge.

This seems like a Samsung fanboy article to me.

≫ Samsung Galaxy A3 () vs Sony Xperia X Compact | Smartphone comparison

However, yes the Xperia XC is far better than A3. Please update your article. Please click here if you are not redirected within a few seconds. We use cookies on our websites.

Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy.

To the AndroidPIT homepage.

Hands-on Sony Xperia X Compact review: is smaller better? Samsung Galaxy A3 review: the mid-range phone that thinks it’s a flagship.

Selfie sony xperia x compact vs samsung a3 2017 click

A small screen for a typical Sony design. A small screen for a typical Samsung S7 design. TouchWiz vs. Xperia UI: cluttered or minimalistic?

TouchWiz will be familiar to Samsung users. Both devices are fast and neither suffer from bugs or delays.

Sony xperia x compact vs samsung a3 2017 blade review

The Sony device offers a quick charge system. Sony Xperia X Compact vs.

Samsung Exynos Number of cores: 6 8 Max. Samsung Galaxy A3 Hardware Samsung.

The X Compact is slightly smaller and this is reflected in the screen size. Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Dual SIM 5.5″ Smart Phone with 4GB RAM, 64GB ROM — Pink Damage-resistant glass such as Corning Gorilla Glass or Asahi Dragontrail Glass is thin, lightweight, and can withstand high levels of force.

Facebook Twitter. Write new comment:. All changes will be saved.

Scroll down for more details. Information about cookies and how you can object to the use of cookies at any time or end their use can be found in our privacy policy. Sony xperia x compact vs samsung a3 2017 Is dustproof and water-resistant.

No drafts are saved when editing. Submit Cancel. I thought I was the only one who noticed it.